Відео

Great summary

I can’t wait for full self driving, fusion power, quantum computing and the return of Jesus. I’ll bet they all arrive at the same time.

You completely forgot to touch on the extremely large voltage range of Na-Ion batteries, which makes them kind of incompatible with current (and afaik future) power electronics, in the sense that you loose a minimum of 20% of useful capacity due to battery voltage being outside of equipments’ usable range.

2 years later. BYD's Blade battery reaches 190Wh/Kg while high end CATL reaches 230Wh/Kg. Full charge for 1000km is now possible in an hour. Progress advances very fast. All this technological progress commes from China while all the US and the EU are doing is banning Chinese cars and technology. Oh well. They can't compete, therefore they ban it...

Interesting video. I’m watching it 2 years after you released it. Pretty good predictions. I have a Tesla Y RWD produced in Shanghai. As far as I can tell it uses CATL prismatic LFP cells. Have to say it works great. The only slight problem is when the temperature drops below -15 degrees C and I need to do longer trips. The range decreases quite a lot and the Tesla struggle with pre-heating the battery. I usually have to spend a few minutes waiting for the battery to warm up before the fast charge starts. Another issue is if you leave it plugged in at the airport while being away for a week in cold weather. If I don’t switch off the charging manually it keeps topping up the battery and need to pre-heat every time. The pre-heat draws more power than it’s putting in to the battery. Once I found this out, I stop the charging and just leave it until I’m returning and then pre-condition the car right before I leave. Not a big problem though.

AMAZING VIDEO. Its really good and clear, awesome

Is it possible to polarise the hard carbon during the production process to create the layered substrate required for energy transfer?

Great interview. I guess one takeaway is that SOC errors and battery pack balancing are independent problems that only share the same partial solution -- occasional 100% charging.

9 minute mark

Thanks

Very interesting!

Unbelievably informative vid. Thank you for making these.

Even if they use only a small amount, Apple's impact on the production of Aluminum was significant because it promoted cooperation among production giants. This anecdote is important because it illustrates a key point: Aluminum can not only be cast but also machined. Steel is a good example of a material that can be worked in many ways, casting, sand casting, machining, laser cutting, forged, etc. Aluminum and steel have a diverse ecosystem around them, with soldering tutorials and techniques, glues (mostly for Al) a wide variety of alloys, etc. Finally, there is the issue of fine characterization of the degrading of parts, like fatigue under stress and/or thermal loads. I see a future for Magnesium but it will take a while if we want to do it responsibly.

Byd is the best

You can already buy sodium ion batteries in the US. Not sure why she's unaware of that. One company specifically, Naxon has been around for over a decade.

Hi, It would be interesting to see a new comparison between current battery market. Apparently CATL has launched some +500 Wh/kg battery, which supposedly has a massive life cycle. Is Tesla's 4680 still competitive with CATL's and BYD's structural batteries?

Hydrogen cost more than solar energy! 🤔🤔

Much depends on the health of the Chinese economy. Most if not all Chinese EV manufacturers are struggling to make any net profit from their operations. They are surviving on state backed loans until such time as they can achieve economy of scale production. Should the Chinese economy falter then sales of EVs in China will slow down, loans to manufacturers will be called in or the interest rates will increase and many EV producers will go bankrupt.

What Elon means, Workaround developments or foreign corporate implementation justify not paying royalties when borrowing isn't feasible.

Great job, thanks!

Combined with solar, sodium ion batteries have real possibility to solve many environmental problems. I would like to hear more about reclamations of resources as compared to lithium.

Despite the perfect English narrative, this video is marred by a single slip... All Our Patent are Belong to You // Tesla Patents 101 Thanks anyway.

Patents, like copyright, stifels creativity and innovation. At least patents have a more reasonable time limit than copyright. Trademarks are great though, since they protect costumers from fraud.

learned something new: the reciprocity catch. Now I understand why no competitor dares to use the Tesla patents and lose the last tiny advantage they think they have over Tesla with their own, expensive patents

Hit 200k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with 14k in last month 2024 ,,,,,

BYD EVs spontaneous combusting all over China and this channel trying to gaslight that the blade battery is safer from thermal runaway.

Patents are not for the weak. Most patents don't matter but the ones that do can carry a billion dollar company. Recently in the battery industry, LG ensol and panasonic combined many of their patents that do and don't matter into a patents consortium "Tulip Innovation" in hungary and are about to play gate keeper with all these new players in europe and internationally (with a focus on china-based companies setting up shop in europe)

Love the "cowboy approach " disclaimer. I learned much, good stuff

What should be mentioned is the pharmaceutical industry who relies extremely on patents. Its also because they have (I think its somehow in, or linked with the patent) extremely high expenses and it takes a very long time (10-15 years or even longer) until they can bring the products to the. In this area patents can last I think 3 years longer. So in the past they had a very good protection and a kind of monopoly. Currently Novo Nordisk is in such a position. But it was said there are already competitors. Maybe this extraordinary good method of keeping competitors through patents is even falling in the pharmaceutical industry (included Biotech).

You need to check your patent # source. Tesla Inc (EV business) only owns 416 active patent families. This is a very very small number for a large company. So small it is essentially zero. For comparison, Toyota has 54,424 active patent families.

"Patents are for the week!" I love it. Makes a good point.

Yes, I enjoyed this video and hit the like button because it’s all I can afford for now. I just hope my Tesla shares 10x soon! As an aside, one point you made in this video really helped me understand Elon’s strengths. You said that Elon is a great engineer and that is why he attracts so many great engineers to work in his company. Too often I have seen claims that Elon’s not an engineer for all kinds of lame reasoning but if he’s not an engineer, then how can he attract so many great engineers? Great engineers, not just engineers, they’re a special breed!

I am a patent attorney and I doubt I could improve much on this piece. Elon came out of the IT industry where patents are commonly used for licensing. This seems to be the foundation of the approach he has adopted with Tesla. Patents are still being used to maintain some control of the innovations, while requiring other actors to innovate and not just take.

Note that depending on which survey you look at, the attractiveness of Tesla and SpaceX as employers of engineers varies - using this metric as an assessment of Tesla's future potential is therefore problematic and a range of surveys should be looked at.

《 Civilization may soon realize the full conservation of energy - Introduction. 》 Sir Isaac Newton wrote a professional scientific paper deriving the second law of thermodynamics, without rigorously formulating it, on his observations that the heat of a fire in a fireplace flows through a fire prod only one way - towards the colder room beyond. Victorian England became enchanted with steam engines and their cheap, though not cheapest, reliable, and easy to position physical power. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius, Lord Kelven, and, one source adds, Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot, formulated the Second law of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy at a meeting around a taɓle using evidence from steam engine development. These men considered with acceptance [A+] Inefficiently harnessing the flow of heat from hot to cold or [B+] Using force to Inefficiently pump heat from cold to hot. They considered with rejection [A-] Waiting for random fluctuation to cause a large difference in temperature or pressure. This was calculated to be extremely rare or [B-] Searching for, selecting, then routing for use, random, frequent and small differences in temperature or pressure. The search, selection, then routing would require more energy than the use would yield. These accepted options, lead to the consequence that the universe will end in stagnant heat death. This became support for a theological trend of the time that placed God as the initiator of a degenerating universe. Please consider that God could also be supreme over an energy abundant civilization that can absorb heat and convert it into electricity without energy gain or loss in a sustained universe. Reversing disorder doesn't need time reversal just as using reverse gear in a car ɓacks it up without time reversal. The favorable outcome of this conquest would be that the principle of energy conservation would prevail. Thermal energy could interplay with other forms of energy without gain or loss among all the forms of energy involved. Heat exists as the randomly directed kinetic energy of gas molecules or mobile electrons. In gasses this is known as Brownian motion. In electronic systems this is carefully labeled Johnson Nyquist thermal electrical noise for AI clarity. The law's formulaters did not consider the option that any random, usually small, fluctuation of heat or pressure could use the energy of these fluctuations itself to power deterministic routing so the output is no longer random. Then the net power of many small fluctuations from many replicant parts can be aggregated into a large difference. Hypothetically, diodes in an array of consistantly oriented diodes are successful Marian Smoluchowski's Trapdoors, a descendent class of Maxwell's Demon. Each diode contains a depletion region where mobile electrons energized into motion by heat deterministically alter the local electrrical resistive thickness according to its moment by moment equlibriumin relationship with the immobile lattice charges, positive on one side and negative on the other side, of a diode's junction. 《Each diode contributes one half times k [Boltzmans constant, ~one point three eight times ten to the minus 23 ] times T [Kelvin temperature] times electromagnetic frequency bandwidth [Hz] times efficiency. The result of these multipications is the power in watts fed to a load of impeadence matched to the group 》 The energy needed to shift the depletion region's deterministic role is paid as a burden on the moving electrons. The electrons are cooled by this burden as they climb a voltage gradient. Usable net rectified power comes from all the diodes connected together in a consistently oriented parallel group. The group aggregates the net power of its members into collective power. Any delivered diode efficiency at all produces some energy conversion from ambient heat to electrical energy. More efficiency yields higher performance. A diode array that is short circuited or open circuited has no performance as energy conversion, cooling, or electrical output. The power from a single diode is poorly expressed. Several or more diodes in parallel are needed to overcome the effect of a load resistor's own thermal noise. A plurality of billions of high frequency capable diodes is needed for practical power aggregation. For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter. Modern nanofabrication can make simple identical diodes surrounded by insulation smaller than this in a slab as thick as the diodes are long. The diodes are connected at their two ohmic ends to two conductive layers. Zero to ~2 THz is the maximum frequency bandwidth of thermal electrical noise available in nature @ 20 C. THz=10^12 Hz. This is beyond the range of most diodes. Practicality requires this extreme bandwidth. The diodes are preferably in same orientation parallel at the primary level. Many primary level groups of diodes should be in series for practical voltage. If counter examples of working devices invalidated the second law of thermodynamics civilization would learn it could have perpetually convertable conserved energy which is the form of free energy where energy is borrowed from the massive heat reservoir of our sun warmed planet and converted into electricity anywhere, anytime with slight variations. Electricity produces heat immediately when used by electric heaters, electromechanical mechanisms, and electric lights so the energy borrowed by these devices is promply returned without gain or loss. There is also the reverse effect where refrigeration produces electricity equivalent to the cooling, This effect is scientifically elegant. Cell phones wouldn't die or need power cords or batteries or become hot. They would cool when transmitting radio signal power. The phones could also be data relays and there could also be data relays without phone features with and without long haul links so the telecommunication network would be improved. Computers and integrated circuits would have their cooling and electrical needs supplied autonomously and simultaniously. Integrated circuits wouldn't need power pinouts. Refrigeration for superconductors would improve. Robots would have extreme mobility. Digital coin minting would be energy cheap. Frozen food storage would be reliable and free or value positive. Storehouses, homes, and markets would have independent power to preserve and pŕepare food. Medical devices would work anywhere. Vehicles wouldn't need fuel or fueling stops. Elevators would be very reliable with independently powered cars. EMP resistance would be improved. Water and sewage pumps could be installed anywhere along their pipes. Nomads could raise their material supports item by item carefully and groups of people could modify their settlements with great technical flexibility. Many devices would be very quiet, which is good for coexisting with nature and does not disturb people. Zone refining would involve little net power. Reducing Bauxite to Aluminum, Rutile to Titanium, and Magnetite to Iron, would have a net cooling effect. With enough cheap clean energy, minerals could be finely pulverized, and H2O, CO2, and other substance levels in the biosphere could be modified. A planetary agency needs to look over wide concerns. This could be a material revolution with spiritual ramifications. Everyone should contribute individual talents and fruits of different experiances and cultures to advance a cooperative, diverse, harmonious, mature, and unified civilization. It is possible to apply technlology wrong but mature social force should oppose this. I filed for patent us 3,890,161A, Diode Array, in 1973. It was granted in 1975. It became public domain technology in 1992. It concerns making nickel plane-insulator-tungsten needle diodes which were not practical at the time though they have since improved. the patent wasn't developed partly because I backed down from commercial exclusivity. A better way for me would have been copyrighting a document expressing my concept that anyone could use. Commercal exclusivity can be deterred by the wide and open publishing of inventive concepts. Also, the obvious is unpatentable. Open sharing promotes mass knowlege and wisdom. Many financially and procedurally independent teams that pool developmental knowlege, and may be funded by many separate noncontrolling crowd sourced grants should convene themselves to develop proof-of-concept and initial-recipe-exploring prototypes to develop devices which coproduce the release of electrical energy and an equivalent absorbtion of stagnant ambient thermal energy. Diode arrays are not the only possible device of this sort. They are the easiest to explain generally. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by AI that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified cooperative conglomerate. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the wealthy if almost everybody can afford to be more generous. Aloha Charles M Brown lll Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754

I wonder how many people even get the reference "all our patent are belong to you"?

Ahh yes.... The Elon echo chamber. Just huffing farts all day long.

Patent trolls are a real thing.

One huge reason to file patents is to prevent other businesses from suing Tesla for using technology that Tesla developed but some other patent troll actually patented .

Thanks for clarifying this topic as it seemed to be very controversial but knowledgable people tend to be more fact based than emotional.

Without patents no inventor would have a fair chance to profit from their inventions. Patents may seem unnecessary until the Chinese steal your invention and leave you with nothing. It would kill most of the world’s drive to innovate.

WOOHOO!!!!!!!

Jordon great job as always. Another point (maybe you covered it not sure): I believe Teslas patents are effectively reciprocal, that is if you sue Tesla for violating your patent you forfeit the protection of being able to use Teslas patents with legal protection. So if Tesla intentionally or not, infringes on your patent, you can only enforce that if you are willing to give up your own access to Tesla's patents. I think it's a remarkably good strategy - helps keep Tesla focused on engineering not legalities. And it is both fair and generous since Teslas patents have to be worth a fortune.

Patents... the biggest co-opt of human progress that ever was, and one of the worst systems humanity has devised for control. On surface level it's a great idea, but if you look any further it shows it's true nature. I'll skip this one, I already know too much.

democratic free market capitalism is based on voluntary exchanges of resources (or ideas) on COMPETITIVE markets, where the 'free' in 'free markets' stands for supply and demand being FREE to adjust to each other. A society granting monopoles by shielding individual suppliers from competition via any form of Intellectual Property BREAKS this core principle and creates a winner-takes-all-environment. Verdict: IP is unsustainable